CRIMINAL MIGRANT WINS FIGHT TO STAY IN UK — CLAIMS SON HATES FOREIGN CHICKEN NUGGETS A controversial court decision has allowed a convicted migrant to remain in Britain after he successfully fought deportation by citing an unusual family reason: his young son allegedly refuses to eat chicken nuggets made abroad. The case has sparked outrage and disbelief, with critics questioning how such a personal domestic argument could influence immigration proceedings. Officials stress that the ruling considered multiple factors, but the bizarre justification has dominated headlines, turning what would normally be a standard deportation appeal into a story that has left the public both shocked and incredulous. Full details of the decision and its implications are still emerging.

Criminal migrant is allowed to stay in Britain after fighting deportation by arguing his son disliked foreign chicken nuggets

Albanian Criminal's Deportation Stopped As His Son Likes UK Chicken Nuggets!  CLOWN WORLD - YouTube

A migrant who fought deportation by arguing his son disliked foreign chicken nuggets has won the right to stay in Britain.

The case of convict Klevis Disha, 39 – who entered Britain illegally under a false name and lied in a failed asylum claim – sparked outrage when it emerged a year ago.

Critics cited it as a stark example of abuse of the European Convention on Human Rights. The Home Office talked tough, pressing to have him expelled – which should have been a formality as he was jailed for two years in 2017.

But despite the outcry he has won his appeal against removal.

Migrant crisis: Albanian criminal allowed to stay in Britain due to son's  dislike of 'foreign' chicken nuggets

His barrister Richard McKee successfully argued it would be ‘unduly harsh’ for his son, 11, to have to join his father in Albania, or be left in Britain without him.

Disha was 15 in 2001 when he ‘entered the UK illegally as an unaccompanied minor’, judges were told.

Two days later he made an asylum claim on the basis of political persecution. He stated, falsely, that he had been born in the former Yugoslavia in 1986. It also appears he gave a false name.

Disha’s asylum claim was refused nine months later with ‘the Home Secretary not being satisfied he had a well-founded fear of persecution’.

The case of convict Klevis Disha, 39 – who entered Britain illegally under a false name and lied in a failed asylum claim – sparked outrage when it emerged a year ago

The case of convict Klevis Disha, 39 – who entered Britain illegally under a false name and lied in a failed asylum claim – sparked outrage when it emerged a year ago

The Home Office (above) talked tough, pressing to have him expelled – which should have been a formality as he was jailed for two years in 2017

The Home Office (above) talked tough, pressing to have him expelled – which should have been a formality as he was jailed for two years in 2017

He appealed, his case dragged on for four years and, in September 2005, he was granted ‘Indefinite Leave to Remain’.

He met his Albanian-born girlfriend the next year, and they had a daughter and a son.

In September 2017, Disha was given a two-year jail sentence after being caught with £250,000 in cash, determined to be the proceeds of crime when he could not account for its origins. The sentence of more than a year meant he should be deported.

 

Related Posts