“THEY WANTED TO CHANGE THE RULES FOR HIM”: PRINCE ARCHIE TURNS SEVEN AMID EXPLOSIVE RENEWED DEBATE OVER THE TITLE THAT ALMOST NEVER WAS As Prince Archie prepares to blow out seven candles in Montecito, the celebratory mood is shadowed by the lingering echoes of a royal firestorm. What should be a simple milestone has instead reignited the fierce controversy over a title that Meghan Markle famously claimed was initially withheld due to “concerns” within the palace. The tension reached a fever pitch just days ago following a reported “bittersweet” clash between Harry and Meghan over a new birthday portrait. However, the most shocking twist involves a private letter unearthed from the palace archives that reveals exactly what happened the night Archie was born. This single document exposes a secret pact that could change the Sussex children’s royal status forever.

As Meghan and Harry’s son Archie celebrates his seventh birthday as a Prince next week, how his title has been fraught with controversy from the get-go

Just a few weeks after the Duchess of Sussex faced backlash for ‘monetising’ her children and releasing candles inspired by them in their honour, her son Prince Archie will be celebrating his birthday on May 6.

The King’s grandson will be basking in the festivities in Montecito, across the pond from the UK – where his parents gave up being working royals in 2020.

Archie’s title has been fraught with controversy since months before that, when Prince Harry, 41, and Meghan Markle, 44, first welcomed their baby boy.

Born on May 6, 2019 at London‘s private Portland Hospital, rather than the traditional Lindo Wing at St Mary’s Hospital, the Sussexes chose to deviate from royal convention by refusing the traditional press photo call following the birth.

However, the greatest scandal surrounding the young royal’s birth seemed to relate to his title. Or, indeed, lack thereof.

Shortly after Archie’s birth, Meghan announced that Archie would be a ‘private citizen’ without a title as they did not want the youngster to be bound by convention or history.

The couple were insistent that they wanted their son to be known as plain ‘Mister Archie’ and not bear the title of royal, which was done to help preserve his privacy.

At the time, journalists such as Omid Scobie, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex ’s future biographer, gushed that this decision was ‘all part’ of their desire to give their son ‘as normal a life as possible’.

Related Posts