Prince Harry In Talks for Princess Diana 30th Anniversary Documentary Sparks Fierce Backlash on Good Morning Britain
Reports that Prince Harry is actively exploring a documentary project commemorating the upcoming 30th anniversary of Princess Diana’s death have triggered sharp public pushback in the UK. The news, spotlighted as the lead discussion on ITV’s Good Morning Britain (GMB), landed on the same day his uncle Earl Charles Spencer published his explosive memoir Swan Song, intensifying scrutiny over the commercialization of Diana’s memory.
The GMB Segment and Viewer Poll
During Tuesday’s broadcast, hosts Susanna Reid and Ed Balls broke the news:
-
The Pitch: Reid reported that the Duke of Sussex is currently in discussions for a documentary marking 30 years since Diana was killed in Paris in 1997, with sources noting Harry is “considering the most meaningful way to honour her legacy”.
-
The GMB Poll: When Good Morning Britain asked viewers on X (formerly Twitter) whether it is right for Prince Harry to produce a documentary about Diana, the public response was heavily negative:
-
No: 67%
-
Yes: 33%
-
Public Reaction: “Leave Her in Peace” vs. A Son’s Prerogative
Online comments reflected deep fatigue with commercial projects surrounding the late Princess of Wales, with many contrasting Harry’s moves against Prince William’s reported stance:
| Viewer Sentiment | Key Arguments & Quotes |
| Critics / Opponents (67%) |
• Accusations of Profiteering: Viewed as another commercial enterprise leveraging personal tragedy: “Diana should be left in peace. No more books or documentaries. It’s all money based & to make money out of her life/death is terrible.”
• Contrast with William: Commenters argued the brothers should preserve quiet dignity: “Harry has turned his Mother into a cash cow and his Uncle has jumped on the bandwagon… Truly feel for William, how difficult to have to maintain quiet dignity in the face of it all.”
• Story Overexposure: Many asserted that Diana’s life has already been thoroughly documented across decades of media.
|
| Supporters / Defenders (33%) |
• A Son’s Personal Right: Supporters pushed back on the idea that the public owns Diana’s narrative: “It’s HIS mother not the public’s! He has every right to do what he wants!”
• Media Double Standards: Others pointed out the constant public criticism Harry faces regardless of what project he undertakes: “Poor Harry, whatever he does everyone moans, give him a break.”
|
A Convergence of Spencer Family Storms
The documentary report arrived in the middle of a broader royal storm:
-
Earl Spencer’s Memoir Fallout: Swan Song hit bookstores the same morning, carrying controversial allegations about King Charles III’s conduct in 1997.
-
Piers Morgan Threatens Legal Action: During the broadcast, Ed Balls noted that broadcaster Piers Morgan announced legal action over claims Spencer made in the book accusing Morgan of publishing intrusive gym photos in the 1990s—prompting Spencer to publicly apologize for an “incorrect assumption”.
-
William’s Reported Anger: Reports that William is “beyond furious” over his uncle reopening childhood trauma make the prospect of another broadcast project by Harry particularly volatile within the royal family.
With August 2027 marking three decades since Princess Diana’s death, the polarized reaction underscores how any effort to commemorate her legacy remains a battleground between public fascination, family privacy, and media commercialization.
