Season 3 of Alice In Borderland has officially aired, causing a stir among fans. While it’s one of Netflix’s most popular shows with a large viewership, many have begun criticizing the series for leaving some important plot points unexplained. One of the biggest issues fans are pointing out is the existence of “plot holes” that make season 3 feel less convincing.

The “Not Enough Players” Situation in the Games: A Major Plot Hole

One of the questions raised within the fan community is why there are never too many players in a game. It never happens that a group of four enters a game, and there are only three phones left. Why is it that no one ever gets left out? If there’s a mismatch in numbers, can people go and find another game? Or is there some system in place where all games are scheduled simultaneously?

This doesn’t seem to align with how the game system works in Alice In Borderland, because if the number of participants is limited, why can’t the remaining players find a different game? And could there be a mechanism that predicts how many people will show up to make sure each game can accommodate them? This is a question that remains unanswered, leaving viewers confused.

Lack of Focus on Building the Borderland World

Another issue is the lack of focus on building the world of Borderland. In season 2, Alice In Borderland did an excellent job of expanding on the mysteries and the behind-the-scenes workings of this world. However, in season 3, instead of exploring these elements, the majority of the screen time is devoted to the games and action, with very little character development.

Many fans believe that delving deeper into the world-building aspect of Borderland, explaining its formation, and the mechanics behind it would have been more interesting than just adding more games without significant character growth. The questions about how Borderland functions, who controls it, and the motivation behind creating such a cruel environment remain largely unexplored.

The Confusion Around the “Citizens” and “Dealers”

Another point of controversy is the unclear distinction between “citizens” and “dealers.” The “citizens” are those who have “completed” the Borderland and chosen to stay there permanently, having control over the games for the next batch of participants. On the other hand, the “dealers,” like Momoka and others, are just regular players who were selected to assist in managing the games.

However, the system behind how this works is still largely ambiguous. How do they decide who plays what role? How do the “dealers” operate? The explanation of this system is still lacking, and viewers are asking for clarification before a US remake happens.

Fix These Plot Holes Before Making a US Remake!

With all these unanswered questions, many Alice In Borderland fans are demanding that before a US remake is made, the creators need to address these plot holes. Fans argue that explaining the unresolved issues about the Borderland world will not only make the story more satisfying, but it will also prevent repeating the same mistakes in future adaptations.

Some have suggested that rather than focusing on side stories or remakes in other countries, the creative team should take more time to explore the details of the games, how Borderland operates, and why people willingly sacrifice their lives to a system like this. These issues need to be solved before more adaptations can be considered.

Conclusion: Clarify the Story Before It’s Too Late

Season 3 of Alice In Borderland leaves many questions unanswered, which has left some fans feeling disappointed. Although the show has many thrilling and captivating moments, the unresolved plot holes take away from the overall satisfaction. Before any US remake happens, it’s crucial to address the core issues of the Borderland world to please the fanbase and avoid repeating the same mistakes in the future.